Sunrise at Pilsdon |
There is a war raging all about us and very few of us know about it. Even those of us living in the countryside where the fighting is the most intense are on the whole blissfully unaware. We can idly gaze at a landscape of wooded dales, bubbling brooks and verdant fields and believe that it is the very essence of peace and order, where the very opposite is in fact the case. We are looking at a battlefield. The combatants? Trees and plants.
OK, I’ll admit the action isn’t exactly Spielberg, but the long slow struggle is nevertheless real and deadly serious. The life of each tree or plant is at stake. The competition for the vital resources of sun, water and soil is intense. Different species have their own strategies for survival, but all are bound by the same obvious constraint - they cannot move from where they were born. Wherever fate placed them, they have to make the best of it.
Trees and grass are mortal enemies. When trees grow to maturity the sun won’t reach the ground beneath. And in your average wood you are witnessing a race for the sun between trees themselves, as they try to out-grow each other to put their topmost leafy branches above the others. Some tree species such as beech and holly are ‘shade-bearing’ in that they are tough enough to cope with cover from taller trees, but many others such as oak, ash and chestnut demand the light and if they don’t get it, they don't thrive.
Humans often meddle with what grows where, normally for very good reasons such as to grow crops for food, or to manage a woodland. Being aware of the relative needs of each plant or tree for light, nutrition, warmth and water is vital for the success of either enterprise. The idea of companion planting, i.e. growing two species of mutually beneficial plants next to or literally amongst each other, often relies on one growing and maturing faster than the other so the first can be harvested before the other species is troubled by lack of light.
Pilsdon's large glasshouse |
Birch trees at the back |
The conflict between tree and cultivated crop came to a head in Pilsdon’s garden this week, and brought head to head the opposing philosophies of tree-hugger and gardener. There are three birch trees growing quite close to the back of our large glasshouse, and I pointed out at the weekly garden meeting that their roots were now reaching into the soil inside the glasshouse, competing with the young grapevine that I had planted a year ago. My suggestion, to fell the nearest of the three trees, raised the hackles of all those present who consider native British trees sacrosanct, particularly since Pilsdon apparently has very few trees to call its own. The counter-suggestion, to uproot the vine, buy a new one and plant it at the other end of the glasshouse, seemed calculated to produce a similar amount of annoyance in me, and succeeded. After a group inspection of said tree, and long and heated debate of a scale only matched by global summits on climate change, a compromise agreement was finally reached. The tree would remain but any of its roots heading into the glasshouse were to be cut.
Trench warfare |
A day later I carried out this savage task with spade, fork and saw. The grapevine can now grow unhindered and since the tree roots were not large the hope is the birch will not be unduly harmed. I hope that a few years from now, Pilsdon residents will clink together their glasses of grape juice and raise a toast to the saviour of their vine who rescued it from an early and ignominious demise.
6 comments:
In spite of my camp on the issue I consider myself a gardener over 'tree-hugger'. I think the groups you were referring to could more rightly be described as those with sense and those lacking in it. And to describe it as a war might be over estimating the power of your beloved shriveled vine? I hope future Pilsdonites will breathe the fresh air from the trees and enjoy the three birch trees sillhoetted on the skyline albeit with a glass of apple juice instead. In the meantime see you at the gardening meeting tomorrow. Vine-hugger.
Clearly the emotional wounds from last week's discussions are still festering. My advice is to go and hug those three birch trees, you will feel much better. As for me I will rise above all the name-calling and instead relish the prospect of all the future grape-based products that will adorn Pilsdon's dinner tables. I can even imagine a nice mix of grape and apple juice would be rather tasty.
Are the apple trees safe though? Who's to say you might cut them down in an attempt to save a dying dandylion?
I suspect you might be stretching the point a little there. Unless you actually do mean a dandy lion as opposed to a dandelion, though I find it hard to imagine a scenario where felling an apple tree could save a lion, dandy or otherwise.
For the record I am a keen supporter of trees of all kinds, and even own a comprehensive guide to identifying British trees. I would only advocate chopping them down if there is a good reason to do so, such as to save a grapevine.
I think a photo of the "vine" might help readers to see this issue in a truer light Matt. The wholesale destruction of every form of vegetative life on the planet will not rescue the fossil of twig and remnant of withered leaf that you are calling a vine. Wake up and smell the coffee; it's already dead. Buy another one and plant it somewhere sensible Treebane.
Thanks for your only slightly misguided comment, Riverdog. I suspect that a photo of the vine in its current form may simply serve to muddy the debate as people on both sides of the tree/vine dichotomy draw erroneous conclusions from its appearance.
It has indeed lost its leaves but that is only natural for a grapevine in the British winter. Give it a few months and it will be budding into leaf again, and now there is no threat from the birch tree roots I hope we will see it vigorously flourishing. My only concern is how you will in all conscience be able to eat its grapes.
Post a Comment